Saturday, January 26, 2008

Not permanent?

Does anyone else think that this is cheating? That a truly removeable tattoo isn't a real tattoo anymore? I haven't gotten a tattoo yet because they're so permanent. OK, I know, 'real' tattoos mostly can be removed with painful and expensive treatments. To me, part of the attraction of a tattoo was that they were a permanent statement. Somehow, this new ink devalues that.

Never mind the fact that I keep thinking it's too good to be true. All I can think is that the ink will likely degrade with time. Of course, this could be a good thing, so I wouldn't be one of a horde of wrinkled grannies going around with a deformed tattoo.

No comments: